State Supreme Court revives challenge to Cook Co. assault weapon ban
Who, or what "Hunter" needs a rapid fire weapon for hunting?
You may as well just go in the woods with sticks of dynamite. Hey Bob how's your bullet riddled meat? Okay Stan once you swallow a few slugs.
No folks they cannot enjoy the same protections within the Second Amendment. Weapons of this nature have only one intent. Obliteration of humans. On a constitutional level, this falls in the "Cruel and Unusual Punishment" category. Only a person with malicious intent would own such a weapon for "Hunting". I could understand if your only hunting bears, but a deer? Yeah those crafty antler-wearing bucks with snow-mobiles must be stopped. Really?
No comments:
Post a Comment