Supreme Court to review blood tests of suspected drunken drivers
For all the blowhards of "States Rights", don't you think some type of "Uniform System" nationwide be in-place for drunk drivers? Take for instance in some states, when you "refuse" a sobriety test, you go too jail. Why can't that be the norm in all states? It makes sense.
Think back on yesterday's post. I advocated violators of the Constitution should be jailed, so cases such as this, would never get to the Supreme/Corporate Court. The drunk idiots rights were violated when the officer took the clown too the hospital for the "test". The drunk idiot said "NO"! They did it anyway, which resulted in the violation of his constitutional rights of illegal search, and seizure. Case Closed.
The Supreme/Corporate Court should "Rule" in the drunk idiots favor. If they don't, they should resign. Whatever the ruling, the States should take note, and collaborate on a more uniform law for drink drivers. We can't have drunken drivers plowing into pedestrians, or speeding on our roadways and getting a slap on the wrist in one state, and life in prison in another. It simply makes sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment