Another judge strikes down U.S. health care mandate

Another judge strikes down U.S. health care mandate



How many judges does it take to agree on the constitutionality portion of this law? If the "Mandate" is unconstitutional, why does Massachusetts have it? Why hasn't that part been ruled so? If a State can do it without question, where's the problem with the Federal system following the same approach? I smell politics from the bench.

Our judicial system is supposed to be unbiased. From the way this back and forth ruling in these courts keep going, politics is playing a role, not judicial responsibility, and prudence. If the Supreme Court rules the "Individual Mandate" as unconstitutional, look at all that money the State of Massachusetts has to pay back to all its citizens. That's something these political judges never thought about when they keep doing this little constitutional, unconstitutional dance.

This is what happens when you put judges on the bench who have no respect for the judicial system. If it's good enough for Massachusetts, it's good for the rest of the country. And if you judges think otherwise, there will be some pretty pissed-off people that will have to give a ton of money back. See if you get re-appointed, or elected after that scenario happens.